Indian Air Force

Explained: Why Gripen Is Unsuitable For The Indian Air Force?

Hello defence lovers! Recently according to some media reports, Swedish aerospace giant SAAB has offered the Indian airforce JAS 39 Gripen at half the price of a Dassault Rafale. SAAB group is pitching hard to sell its fighters to the Indian airforce, but all the efforts are in vain. In this article, we are going to discuss why the probability that the Indian airforce will pick JAS 39 Grippen over the other competitors in MMRCA 2.0 is as good as negligible.

JAS 39 Gripen

The Saab JAS 39 Gripen is a light single-engine multirole fighter aircraft manufactured by the Swedish aerospace company Saab AB. The Gripen has a delta wing and canard configuration with a relaxed stability design and fly-by-wire flight controls.

Gripen was developed to replace ageing the JAS 37 Viggen and JAS 35 Draken fighters of the Swedish air force. Today along with the Swedish airforce, Gripen severe the Brazilian air force, South African airforce, Czech air force and the Royal Thai airforce.

It is powered by the Volvo RM 12 engine which is a derivative of the American GE f404 engine. We will later talk about this fact in details.


When the Indian airforce purchases any equipment, it becomes the brand ambassador of that product. The world sees what the world’s fourth-largest airforce is inducting into its service. Since IAF inducted Rafale, it nearly became an export success. Following India’s purchase, the United Arab Emirates has also ordered 80 Rafales from France. SAAB is eyeing such an export success for its Gripen through the Indian Airforce. That’s why it is pitching Gripen to the IAF so aggressively. Gripen as a product might be very good but we will discuss the reasons why the Indian airforce won’t induct these machines into its service. There are three main reasons. let’s discuss them in detail.

The Rafale Factor

As we have discussed countless times earlier, going for follow on orders for Rafale makes greater sense for the Indian airforce. Since IAF and the government of India have invested heavily in the infrastructure required for Rafale and the India-specific enhancements, purchasing for rafale in the MMRCA 2.0 will be a practically feasible decision. Moreover buying new rafales will be less time-consuming as pilots are already trained on Rafale, logistically easy, and of course a cheaper. We earlier had the advantage of moving the production line of Rafale to India, but now after UAE signed a deal for 80 rafales, it seems to be difficult.

The Tejas Factor

Now, let us discuss the next prominent reason, the Tejas Factor. India’s indigenously built Tejas is of the same category as that of JAS 39 Gripen. Both the fighters use the versions of GE f404 engines as powerplants. Moreover, IAF has already placed orders for 83 Tejas MK1A fighters. Tejas is comparatively a newer platform compared to Gripen and hence is much more susceptible to newer technologies compared to Gripen. Tejas MK II is also is in the pipeline. Thus if the Indian Airforce needs a single-engine fighter, Tejas and Tejas MK II will be the perfect choices, not Gripen.

The General Electric Problem

Now let us discuss the most significant reason, the general electric problem. In 1978, under the leadership of Rajiv Gandhi[source], the Indian government had finalized a deal with SAB to procure the JAS 37 Viggen. However, the deal was blocked by America as it imposed an embargo over the derivatives of American engines used in Viggen. The Jaguars in the Indian Airforce which are operational even today were purchased instead of Viggen. Now, even after three decades, the story remains almost the same. American competitors- Lockheed Martin’s F 21 and Boeing’s f/A 18 super hornets are competing in the very same competition which the Gripen is willing to win. As we have discussed earlier, Gripen uses Volvo RM 12 which is a derivative of the American GE F404 engine. Keeping all odds against Gripen aside, let us assume if Gripen is selected over F-21. Will the USA ever let that happen? The history will repeat itself. The USA will definitely impose an embargo on the engines.


Thus we can conclude that there are negligible chances that India will go for Gripen in its MMRCA 2.0 program. SAAB should persuade its other potential customers, not the Indian Airforce.


Sheershoo Deb

I am a defense aspirant preparing to be an officer in the prestigious Indian armed forces. Earning the prestigious blue uniform is my dream.


  1. Gripen is still competing in Canada wouldn’t you think USA would care even more there?

    Also I wouldn’t be so sure the Indian plane would be better and more modern and capable than JAS-39 E.

  2. No need for Griffin or any other fighter.
    Get tejas mark 2 and then tedbf, amca.
    In the interim get few old mig29 and sukhoi

  3. Why it seems like advertising g rather then news article. Well, the argument mag good but not enough for detrimental enough for said purchase

  4. If France is not lazy after UAE Deal we should definitely go for Rafale but if France is lazy and incompetent with setting up production facilities in India
    Then we still have the option of Eurofighter typhoon tranche 4. Airbus Germany is highly interested and has offered maintenance and production facilities in India for 150 Million $ per jet and 170 Million $ per jet with weapons package and maintenance of 6 years deal may end up at a cost of 21 Billion $ with spares as well

    As our economy is set to grow defense budget will definitely increase so we will be also able to order indigenous design

    But at the end if day it’s my opinion
    You can reply your opinion

  5. A few points: (1) ..Tejas 2 is twin engine fighter which will use the F 414 engine. The Tejas 1 has the GE 404 engine. (2) India has already sined a deal to manufacture 404 engines for Tejas 1 in India and to be followed by 414 engines for Tejas 2. So engine manufacture is not important. (3) US may stll apply CATSAA for import of the Russian S 400 system to India. (4) The function of a single and twin engines are different, weaponry payload, distances covered, roles differ.(4) Requirement for Gripen was before decision to manufacture Tejas 1 not after. I do not think India will now stop the line for Tejas. (5) India may probably opt for the Raphale if the US sanctions (CATSAA) us which may include engine manufacture in India. (6) There is no comparision between Tejas and Gripen. The latter comes with far better avionics, radar etc, perhaps better than Raphale? The situation is politically very fluid based on Putin’s visit to India, I dia’s defence commitment to Russia, how the US reacts with CATSAA.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Back to top button
Translate »